WASHINGTON – To avoid geopolitical “space station” consequences, international space stations must ensure that commercial space stations are ready before retirement, industry officials and other consultants warn.
NASA’s low-Earth orbit trading strategy will require the development of one or more commercial sites by the end of this decade, which will allow NASA to transfer current research on ISS to those institutions and then retire to the ISS, possibly around 2030. Initial studies for commercial sites are estimated by 10 to 12 proposals submitted by companies seeking one of several LEO Development (CLD) contracts.
“That transition will allow NASA to shift large sums of money and manpower to search purposes,” he said. Robin Gats, Director of ISS Program at NASA Headquarters, It includes an estimated two-year transition period from which NASA will transfer operations from ISS to those commercial sites.
Another witness at the hearing warned of the consequences of ISS retirement before business successors were ready. “It’s more urgent today than ever to ensure a seamless transition, because our confidence in space resources is so high and we want to fill in any other gaps,” said Jeffrey Manber, chief executive of Nanorax. A company looking to develop a commercial space station. There is nothing wrong with not giving leadership to other nations.
That means China has launched the main module of the space station, which it plans to build in the next few years. Manber warned last month that the company had lost an anonymous customer who decided to fly a payment carrier at the site, not on the ISS via Nanorax.
“I am not afraid of cooperation or competition with China, but we cannot even allow the idea that in 20 years we will hand over the people who work in LEO to others,” he said. He asked the committee to support the CLD program to “make sure there is no space.”
Todd Harrison, director of the Aerospace Safety Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said China is America’s largest competitor in space. “The real purpose of this competition is to see who can build the broadest and strongest coalition,” he said. Over the next decade, any group of nations that will emerge as a loading force in space will develop rules for the following space trade and exploration.
It was difficult to finance NASA’s LEO trading strategy. NASA requested $ 150 million in the 2020 and 2021 budget years, but received only $ 15 million and $ 17 million, respectively. The agency has requested $ 101.1 million for the fiscal year 2022, but in July it will provide only $ 45 million for the program. The Senate still does not have a version of the bill.
Representative Randy Weber (R-Texas) NASA’s business program is questionable. “Isn’t NASA in danger of leaving the Earth’s orbit to the Chinese by developing development programs in a year or two?” In an agreement with Axis Space, the agency proposed “doubling” the action by linking “business modules to ISS” to its own business site.
We believe we need more ways to have the greatest success for one or more big business LEO forums, ”Gates said. The stock market at the space station is one of these.
She added that NASA is working on a revised version of the ISS transition plan for Congress “in the coming weeks” to address congressional concerns over the lack of details. The new report states, “It is an in-depth strategic and strategic plan for the ISS transition,” with additional details on NASA requirements and specifications.
That transition plan will depend on the continued operation of ISS until the end of the decade. Recent problems at the site, cracks in the Russian module that caused low-frequency air flow, and problems with the Nauka module when it was locked in the station in July have raised doubts about the station’s long-standing skepticism.
Former NASA astronaut William Pherd, who commanded the first long-haul IS mission 20 years ago, said NASA needed to establish “closer working relationships with our Russian counterparts” to better understand those issues. In the program.
He called for more work to be done on the root cause of the cracks in one of the Russian modules. “They do not understand why these cracks are now visible,” said Russian and American engineers. I don’t think the site is in immediate danger, but we need to understand this better before we can clean the site for another year of operation.
NASA’s Aerospace Security Advisory Panel said at a Sept. 23 meeting that it was also monitoring issues related to air leaks and nuisance. NASA has called on members of the NASA to work to ensure that there is no gap with any of its business successors as it seeks to extend its operations by the end of the decade.
“NASA needs to be clear about the requirements and deadlines for the industry and make sure we work with ISS,” said Member of Parliament George Nield. Without proper, timely financial support, there is a risk of a gap because it is the only timeline that can be provided.