EU energy crisis is another threat to fossil fuels

By Johnny Lupsha, current events writer

Economic savings and health benefits lead to green energy debate. In addition to cutting off air and water pollution, the abandonment of fossil fuels in the past is a sight to behold for many who are exposed to renewable energy. The energy crisis in the European Union has now been added to the list.

Air pollution in the fuel filter
Over the past several decades, industrialized nations have been exposed to high levels of air pollution, and governments have continued to impose stricter regulations. Photo by Shutterstock

Energy prices in the European Union (EU) have recently risen due to limited natural gas supplies to Russia and increased demand in the Covenant-Saving world. These concerns, among others, seem to be another sign that the transition to green energy is on the rise, especially as most EU countries now rely on gas-fired power plants to supply electricity to their citizens.

What are some other incentives to leave fossil fuels behind us, and what is the basis for them? In the video series Energy Science-Resources and Power Explained, Dr. Michael E. Wisssem, Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at the University of Washington, St. Louis, explains the science behind it.

Moving over coal

“Coal combustion releases a lot of pollutants, especially carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, trace elements – that cotton – ozone, nitrous oxide, sulfur oxide and heavy metals such as mercury and lead,” said Dr. Whiskey. “Fifty percent of US air pollution comes from electricity, and mostly from coal.

Combustion of oil and gas also causes air pollution, and although the composition of the fuels is different, the pollution is different.

According to Dr. Wisdom, 70% of carbon monoxide pollution comes from gasoline and diesel fuel, as well as 40% of volatile organic compounds and nitrous oxides, and one-third from carbon dioxide. From lung cancer, asthma, aggravated and chronic pneumonia to infant death, everything is linked to air pollution, especially coal.

“These toxins and nitrous oxides are not part of hydrocarbons. They are naturally occurring pollutants that come with oil, ”he said. But the petroleum refining process does not remove all of these pollutants, and some of them are still in the fuel you put into your car or truck.

Could it be too easy?

Consumption of such bills, such as clean air, seems to be leading to a national crisis, even from such highly controlled fossil fuels as national standards. It could be a crisis, at least for a while. In other words, such a major industrial transition seems more frightening and even more tragic.

How expensive is it to enforce the fresh air law – and therefore, what is the burden on a country’s economy?

“The 2011 study calculates the amendments to the 1990 Flu Law between 1990 and 2020 [would] Compared to just $ 65 billion in implementation costs, direct economic savings will reach $ 2 trillion, ”said Dr. WCC. “These huge savings are mainly due to the reduction in human health problems and the loss of working days.

For example, EPA estimates that In 2010 alone, more than 160,000 premature deaths and 13 million working days were lost due to the implementation of the fresh air law.

The transition to green energy will be a major industrial transition with advantages and disadvantages to be considered in practice rather than theory. However, if the EU’s current energy crisis is any indication, the change could be considered.

Great courses are edited daily by Angela Shoe Maker

Leave a Comment