Estimating a climate-free home in the United States: using as little energy as possible from clean sources

Coping with climate change involves rejuvenating many aspects of life, but some of these changes feel real and personal at home.

128m households in the United States generate about 20% of the planet’s greenhouse gas emissions, which generate energy for heating, cooling, and lighting. Americans typically live in larger and more hungry homes than other countries, using twice as much energy as the average British and Chinese average.

This huge contribution is now being under the control of Joe Biden’s administration, which has proposed reef measures to build and upgrade 2 m low-rise homes. “Evacuation is a big job, but it’s an important one,” said Michael Regan, director of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Immediate change is needed to combat the effects of climate change. To reach zero emissions by the middle of the century, the sale of fossil fuel heaters will be completed within five years, all new buildings must be powered by clean electricity by 2030, and half of the existing buildings must be fully redeveloped. A.D. The latest historical report by the International Energy Agency in 2040 warns.

“Despite the neglect of household appliances, they are contributing significantly to climate change, and we need to address that,” said Mike Hensche, a carbon offset expert at RMI. “That affects people’s lives – our homes are our refuge, our well-known places. But we hope that the change will make people’s homes more comfortable, safer and healthier, and reduce the effects of climate change.

So what do future climate-friendly homes look like?

Less – and clean – design the house to use energy

External and internal changes in our structures will shape the future of non-climate housing. According to Alejandra Megia Cunningham, a decommissioning advocate at the Council for the Protection of Natural Resources, houses “must follow interconnected mantra” – “using as little energy as possible from pure sources at the right time.”

Solar panels on roofs are more common when community solar programs may offer an option in a rented or apartment building. Solar panels can also be paired with home batteries to store excess energy, which, with proper coverage, will help build a home even during a long power outage in Texas earlier this year.

Such a situation would open up the possibility of utility companies operating an automated housing network, as is the case in Vermont units, to manage demand and supply in collaboration with central infrastructure. “The fact that solar panels, batteries, and water heaters are all integrated and distributed makes the home a part of the energy system and can save a lot of money,” says Hensche.

Instead of generating high demand for gas or coal, energy efficiency will be smarter and more automated by dissipating energy throughout the day to work together in a windy and solar grid.

New appliances to heat and cool the house

Another energy-efficient step is to properly cover homes. In fact, new homes may already be installed in factories to reduce heat dissipation.

Deep reduction in emissions involves renovating the main appliances in the home, such as the water heater, stove and air conditioning unit. As these items get older, they will be wasted and will need to be replaced with more efficient cleaners.

Some of these replacements are relatively harmless, such as installing heat pumps, either in the basement or on the side of the house. Heat pumps operate on the same principles as cooling, change the indoor temperature and vice versa. You can heat and cool your home and heat your water four times more efficiently than a gas-powered version.

The changes you notice in your daily life

Other changes become more obvious in everyday life, such as replacing light bulbs with LEDs, installing low-flow shower heads, and favoring gas stoves with electric stoves.

Such a change may not be appropriate for some home-cooked cooks, but proponents point to rapid heating, reduced indoor air pollution, and the risk of injury to curious children.

“People practice technology as an induction cooker. Rohini Srivastava, an architect from the Council on Energy Conservation in the United States, said: “They are no better off than gas.”

Exhaust gas also eliminates the need for carbon monoxide in the home, although it may be a normal feature in the growing age of Western American smoke.

At what cost?

According to Rover America, it all costs money – decarbonize to an average American family of about $ 70,000. And broader, systemic changes require more concerted efforts to reduce the use of vehicles around traffic and walking communities, as well as to make homes more resilient to storms and fires.

Climate activists are asking for government support to help with this transition – San Francisco is currently working on a $ 5.9 billion converter to turn all the gas into gas – but the public is not happy about the changes.

“The only way we can do this is if the house feels comfortable and user-friendly,” Cunningham said. “You need to know the difference between taking a hot shower, being cool in the summer and being warm in the winter and how it all works.

Leave a Comment