California recalls that the vote could weaken the state’s worst climate policies

Follow our latest updates on California Memory Choice And Governor Newsom.

California has long had the largest solar panels and electric cars in the nation, fighting global warming. But the state’s power-hungry climate policies still face the biggest challenge.

Voters in California are set to oust Democratic Gov. Gavin Newson ahead of the Sept. 14 election. Many Republicans vying to replace Mr. Nixon want to push back the state’s powerful plans to curb California’s impact as the world’s fifth-largest economy in a bid to tackle global warming.

According to election rules, if more than 50 percent of voters choose to remember him, Mr. Newsom will be ousted. If that happens, the ruling party will get the most votes out of 46 candidates – even if that person does not get a majority.

Democrats are worried that Mr. Nixon will lose, although last week’s vote showed that voters were gathering around the region.

Republican presidential nominee Larry Alder, a conservative radio presenter, said “global warming is a warning sign” and “to end the war on oil and gas.” Another leading candidate, Republican businessman John Cox, says California’s climate policies have made the state inaccessible to many. Former Republican mayor of San Diego, Kevin Fowlkonner, also took the initiative to oversee the city’s first climate plan.

“There is a real potential for change,” says Richard Frank, professor of environmental protection at Davis University in California. California has had a significant impact on both domestic and international climate policy, and that could easily be diminished.

Under the past three regimes: Arnold Schwester, Jerry Brown and Mr. Newsom-California have enacted some of the most far-reaching laws and regulations in the country to avoid fossil fuels.

That utility will limit the use of electricity to 100 percent of trucks and trucks and regulations to limit building codes that encourage them to stay away from natural gas to heat homes. It includes. The California Legislature, the state’s most powerful air regulator, has ordered the Air Resources Board to reduce emissions by 40 percent below the 1990 levels by 40 percent.

Although California occupies only part of the country’s emissions, it is often used as a testing ground for climate policy. Pure electricity is reflected in states like New York and Colorado, and Democrats in Congress are now working on a nationwide version.

Under federal fresh air law, California is the only state allowed to pass its own vehicle pollution laws. California laws have been passed in 14 other states, and the federal government has repeatedly pushed for its own rules.

But California is also struggling with the effects of clean energy and global warming. Last August, recorded heat waves triggered rotation signals across the country, with partial grid operators not adding enough clean energy to compensate for offline solar panels after sunset. The state’s largest utility, Pacific Gas and Electricity, had to repeatedly cut off electricity to consumers to prevent wildfires.

Mr. Nixon was pressured to do more by the state’s top elected official due to the record-breaking drought and severe fires. Last September 2035, the Climate Board instructed the nation to issue regulations banning the sale of new petrol cars across the country. He called on agencies to impose new restrictions on oil and gas drilling. The state transportation agency recently finalized plans to provide more funding for measures to curb emissions, such as public transportation or bicycles.

And in the recent budget, Mr. Newsom directed more than $ 12 billion in climate programs to address severe water shortages and protect forest communities from wildfires.

During his campaign, Mr. Newsom also attacked his opponents, mitigating the dangers of global warming. In an interview with ABC News last month, Mr Nixon said:

“California has been in a state of climate change and all of that could be reversed quickly,” said Nathan Klick, a spokesman for the Newcom campaign.

Mr. Cox and other Republican opponents say Mr. Newsom has not done enough to keep California’s forests vulnerable to fire. They argue that the disruption of local regulations is increasing costs in a state where there is already a severe housing shortage.

A.D. “I want to clean up the pollution of the world, but I am not behind the middle and low-income people,” said Mr. Cox, who successfully ran against Newcom in 2018. When China builds a new coal-fired power plant – do you really think the price of energy in our state will really make a difference? ”

If Mr. Newsom is remembered, the new governor is likely to overturn many of California’s key climate laws, not because the legislature remains in the hands of the Democrats. But that still leaves room for major changes.

For example, the new buyer may reverse Mr. Nixon’s pressure to restrict the production of new gasoline vehicles or oil and gas drilling by 2035, as they are under executive order. A governor may appoint new officials who have little interest in climate control to various agencies, including the Air Agency Board, although doing so could conflict with the legislature that oversees appointments. Every ruler also has the breadth of time to figure out how to apply existing climate laws.

Mr. Radio, the host of the talk show, does not see climate change as a serious threat, and emphasizes wind and solar energy. “Of course there is global warming,” he said. “Climate change is always changing. Has it got a degree or two in the last few years? Yes. Is artificial activity part of that? Yes. But no one really knows what it is. ”

He added: “The idea is that the planet will be destroyed if we do not force it to feed on the same renewable energy system.

The old man’s view contradicts the scientific agreement. Last month, the United Nations panel of scientists, since the 19th century, has been driven by human activities such as fossil fuels and deforestation. He warned that if countries did not turn to clean energy, the effects of heat waves, droughts and wildfires would continue.

Instead of focusing on renewable energy, Mr. Cox said he would build large firefighting aircraft to deal with wildfires. He also argued that countries such as China should increase their natural gas production so that they could rely on coal rather than coal. “If we reduce the cost of natural gas and send it to China, we will do amazing things for the world’s pollution problem,” he said.

Mr. Cox also disagreed with Mr. Nixon’s plan to release new petrol vehicles by 2035. “But we are struggling to generate enough electricity for our air conditioners in August,” he said. “Where can we get electricity for 25 million electric vehicles?”

Mr. Lowell, who went further down the election, criticized Mr. Newsom for failing to cover the state’s wildfire budget. Although it supports 100 percent pure electricity, the state is at risk of further extinction without relying on sources such as nuclear power. He also said he would work with the legislature on a policy to increase the number of electric vehicles on petrol-powered vehicles, which are not based on “regional restrictions.”

All three Republican candidates have said they will push for the reopening of the state’s last remaining nuclear plant, Diablo Canyon, by 2025. Critics of the closure have warned that California’s power shortages could worsen and lead to more natural gas burning. , Which creates emissions.

Any new governor will serve only until the next California election in 2022, and some experts predict a political grid will occur. But even a short-term grid can have a significant impact on climate policy.

California is striving to achieve its 40 percent reduction target by 2030. Achieving this goal will require all state agencies to work together and develop additional strategies to reduce fossil fuels use in power plants. , Houses and vehicles. It has also been criticized for relying on poorly prepared carbon offsets that prevent pollution from large industrial enterprises.

“From now until 2030, there will be many years left,” said Kara Horotz, associate director of the Emmett Institute for Climate Change at the USAA Law School. It is very difficult to see how we will achieve if we spend a year or more, as the Air Resources Board has been told not to prioritize emissions.

That, in turn, can have devastating consequences nationwide. President Biden They pledge to halve the country’s emissions by 2030 and hope to convince other world leaders that the United States plans to get there. Without California, that task would be even more difficult.

California has a huge impact on clean vehicle standards, in part because it can develop its own laws and promote the car industry to develop clean cars. The Biden administration recently proposed nationwide California car laws. Some fear that if California does not push for electric vehicles, the federal government will feel less pressured.

“I can never imagine the federal government going ahead of California,” said Mary Nichols, former chairman of the Air Resources Board. California has always had this special role as the first movers.

Sean Hubler Contributed.

Leave a Comment