Officials of some of the world’s largest oil companies, who have been under oath and questioned, have denied the allegations, saying they know they will be affected by climate change. .
Comparing oil companies to Big Tobacco, House Democrats presented the executives of Exxon Mobile, Chevron, Shell and BP America in front of a camera and described it as a “historic hearing” about the companies’ role in climate change for decades.
Ro Canana de-Khalif, a spokesman for the court, said the power giants hoped they would not “follow the same toy book” as cigarette companies, and that they had hidden information about the harmful effects of their products.
“You are the most powerful leaders in the corporate world during the transformation of our planet. Be better. ” “Protect us from temptation today. We really have no interest.”
Democrats have provided internal documents when Exxon scientists realized that burning fossil fuels would be climate change, as the general manager called the link “unheard of.”
“I do not agree that there is a disparity,” testified Exxon CEO Darren Woods. “As science grows, our science develops.”
Eager to show that they are actively working with global warming, the executives highlighted the voluntary actions they have taken in the past. In recent years, as public consensus on human-caused climate change has intensified, major energy companies have expanded their limited investment in clean energy sources and adopted some government measures to curb emissions, such as lowering carbon and methane control.
Democrats in the panel, however, denounced those efforts as “green washes” – a vicious attempt to show that their actions were more environmentally friendly.
In one of the most spectacular moments of the trial, representative Katie Porter, De-Calif, took two pots with M & Ms – almost one, and Shell said she would spend about $ 17 billion on oil and gas this year, and the chemicals and other empty ones, the company said. It shows less than $ 3 billion in renewable energy such as wind and solar energy.
“Mrs. Watkins, does this sound like a big deal to you?” Porter interviewed Shell’s president, Gretchen Watkins. “To me, this does not seem to be the answer. This is a green wash.
I was quick to respond to Thursday’s hearing, which was a scandal in a secret video in which the Exxon lobby company described the lobby’s efforts to tackle climate change in July. But congressional Democrats want to keep Big Oil executives at bay for a while. This is the first time that executives have been sworn in at a climate change hearing.
Carolyn Maloni, chairwoman of the Housing Control and Improvement Committee, said the Exxon lobbyist had made the price of carbon pollution a “simple talk” and that it had ignored the policy because it knew it would never happen.
“Like tobacco officials, they lie openly,” says Maloni.
Maloni announced plans to call on all four oil companies to publish climate-related costs for advertising, public relations, and “shadow groups”, saying the companies had so far refused to do so.
A.D. In 2017, researchers at the University of Harvard, looking at decades of internal and public documents from Exxon, found that approximately 80 percent of fossil fuels have been affected by climate change, and that the same percentage of public relations as advertising contributed to global warming. used to.
Republicans have rejected the hearing, saying it was an attempt to intimidate oil companies that claim the country’s economy is based on providing the power the country needs. He used the session as an opportunity to beat President Joe Biden in actions that he said hurt American energy rights and killed jobs, such as the rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline.
“The purpose of this hearing is clear to present the party theater to the main-time news,” said James Comer, R-Ky.
House Democrats have tried to pull out of the oil giants with massive campaigns and announcements to weaken climate change efforts, but to no avail.
Kana, which oversees the subcommittee on environmental protection, has called on executives to reduce fossil fuels in line with the Paris Agreement. At a distance, the CEOs simply promise to reduce emissions.
Kanaana failed to tell the lobby group to stop opposing the electric vehicles that the CEO of the American Petroleum Institute had witnessed.
Maloni urged the executives one by one to pledge to stop spending money to fight emissions to reduce emissions. She did not provide the simple “yes” she wanted.
Shell Watkins: “Mrs. Maloni, we have spent a lot of money on climate change.