Biden Climate Plan for: Tax Credit, Regulation and State Action

WASHINGTON – A week before President Biden went to a major global warming summit, the United States still has a new plan to meet its ambitions to cut off greenhouse gas emissions. Heating the planet.

The administration’s current strategy includes three-way tax incentives for wind, solar and other clean energy tax incentives, to limit pollution from power plants and automobile tails, and to limit state energy laws.

An analysis released this week by Rodium Group, a non-partisan think tank, shows that Mr. Biden could technically live up to his promise to reduce emissions from 50 percent in 2005 to 2030. The United States is historically the largest source of pollution. It is heating up the planet.

But the chances of success are small; The approach poses significant legal, logistical, and political challenges. The process can take years and the conservative Supreme Court can overturn it or the future president could easily back off. And relying on states to improve their clean energy laws will turn the struggle into environmentalists and fossil fuels at the state level.

“That mixed tax credit, and new federal regulations and new state measures will make the target more accessible. But there is a lot of ifs. “You need to raise the level of clean energy you have not yet done. You need an Environmental Protection Agency to set rules for every power plant in the United States in a way that you have not yet done. And you have to hope that the Supreme Court does not reject that. Everything must be broken in the right way.

The White House’s main hope of drastically reducing emissions was blocked by West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin III, a major vote in an evenly divided Senate.

The clean-up program quickly cleaned up the electricity sector by rewarding and punishing those who did not convert to coal, oil and gas to wind, solar, nuclear and other clean energy. By 2030, it is expected to generate 40 percent of the country’s electricity from clean energy.

Mr Manchin, who is financially affiliated with the coal industry and whose state produces natural gas, said he would oppose any move that would hurt coal and gas companies.

A major scientific report released in August concludes that countries must urgently move away from fossil fuels to avoid severe droughts, high temperatures, water shortages, hurricanes, rising seas, and ecological damage. But according to a new UN study, 15 major fossils, including the United States, plan to produce more oil, gas and coal by 2030.

Mr. Baiden, who is currently negotiating with Capital Hill, has been weakened by the cancellation of a clean electricity program from a huge budget. On November 1, he is scheduled to attend the crucial United Nations General Assembly in Glasgow. US leadership in fighting climate change.

Speaking at CNN Town Hall on Thursday night, Mr. Biden arrived in Scotland and said, “I promise the world that we will have zero emissions and net zero emissions by 2035. On the board 2050 or so, but from now until 2030, we have to do a lot to show what we are doing to get there.

Accompanying the president to Scotland, in addition to a significant portion of his cabinet, will be John Kerry and Gina McCarthy, both former Obama administration veterans’ climate consultants. During that administration, Mr. Kerry and Ms. McCarty traveled to various international climate negotiations, Mr. Kerry promised that the United States would enact strong climate legislation, which it never did, and Ms. McCarty outlined chimneys and strict pollution laws. Power plants set up by the Trump administration but backtracked.

Mr. Biden could present the plan to a skeptical audience in Glasgow.

“Biden was strong on what he said about climate change,” said Lawrence Tubina, a former French ambassador for climate change and now chief executive of the European Climate Foundation. But loyalty is a problem. There is still a question mark – how can it be delivered?

Still, Mr. Biden seems ready to present one of three major carbon dioxide-cutting policies.

The current bill before Congress includes nearly $ 300 billion in tax incentives for wind, solar and nuclear power plants and consumers and buyers of electric vehicles. The tax incentives last for ten years – a change from existing net energy tax credit programs, usually after one to five years, although they are often renewable. It will also include $ 13.5 billion for the construction of charging stations for electric vehicles and the introduction of heavy duty vehicles. It will cost $ 9 billion to upgrade the grid, making it more conducive to wind and solar power, and $ 17.5 billion to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from federal buildings and vehicles.

That package is the single largest federal expenditure to promote clean energy, and radio analysis shows that carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced by up to 25 percent to meet one-third to one-half of Mr. Biden’s emissions. 2005 standards by 2030.

Oregon Democrat Ron Weiden, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, is the co-author of that net energy tax credit package. Mr Widen said he would fly to Scotland to announce that the United States had enacted a major law on carbon dioxide emissions before the Glasgow summit ended on November 14.

“The president can say that this is the most comprehensive climate law passed by Congress,” Mr. Widen said in an interview, although he believes the bar is low: the United States has not gone through big weather. Changing the law.

“This is the first tax reform that combines financial incentives to reduce emissions, and as you say, the more you reduce emissions, the more you save.” Said Mr. Widen. We think you will have an unusual increase in renewable goods and clean transportation.

Rhodium analyst Mr. Larson agrees. “The United States has not had this basis for pure energy tax credits for a long time,” he said. This gives appliances, car manufacturers and builders the confidence they have never had before.

But they will not target the president on their own.

To that end, Rhodesus’ analysis shows that the Environmental Protection Agency must release stricter regulations for the country’s three major greenhouse gas companies: cars, power plants, and methane leaks. Gas.

Under President Barack Obama, under the leadership of the EPA, Ms. McCarthy helped to strengthen those three sources of pollution by enacting the largest climate laws the United States has ever seen.

Almost none of them remain in place today. The Supreme Court has ruled that McCarty’s law is no longer enforced to reduce pollution from coal-fired power plants, and the Trump administration has backtracked.

A.D. “There was a lot of support and trust in the Obama administration when it came to these rules,” said Joseph Aldi, one of Mr. Obama’s negotiators at the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit. But now there are skeptics who say, ‘We are worried that the next administration will not fix what has been done.’ The question is how long will this last legally and politically?

The question is whether Mr. Trump is happy with the collapse of Obama’s climate policy. The fossil fuel industry opposes new environmental regulations, which could be finalized before a conservative Supreme Court, including the three judges appointed by Mr. Trump. The former president appears to be weighing another race for the White House in 2024.

Mr Larson said government action, which is not based on White House residents, is an important part of the national elimination strategy.

In the past, 29 states have released their own versions of the clean electricity program that Mr. Biden hopes to implement across the country. California, led by many states, has updated those laws to make them more desirable. By 2035, if most or most of the states enacted legislation designed to generate all their electricity from zero carbon sources – the same target set by Mr. Biden – could significantly reduce the country’s carbon footprint.

Mr. Larson pointed to an Illinois law that would cut off coal and gas-powered electricity by 2050.

But the continuity of such legislation depends on the structure of government houses – and some states with vast renewable resources have strong political opposition to such policies.

“If my state, the state of the sun, had clean energy standards, all of us in the United States would be able to achieve our clean energy goals,” said Kathy Caster, a Florida Democrat who chairs the House Climate Election Committee. Crisis. But the electricity service industry in my state opposes it.

Democrats will continue to push, she said. “We work as hard as we can, and then we get up and do more,” she says.

Leave a Comment