An oil pipeline is planned even when California is far from gas

LOS ANGELES (AP) – A proposal to replace a pipeline shut down in 2015 after 25 years of torrential downpours off California’s worst offshore coast, despite a state push to ban gas-powered vehicles and oil rigs, is under review by the government.

The $ 300 million proposal by Houston-based Plan All America Pipe is expected to enter a critical phase in a new investigation into the state’s oil industry following the construction of a offshore pipeline near Huntington Beach in October. That breakup closed at least 25,000 gallons (94,635 liters) of crude oil and resulted in a fatal marine life.

Far north, the 123-mile (198 km) plain passes through the coast near Santa Barbara before turning inward. In the middle of the state, the length to Kern County is buried and invisible. For decades there has been a significant link between offshore oil stations and offshore factories, with an average load of 1.8 million gallons (6.9 million liters).

California Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padila has spoken out against future threats.

“We have repeatedly seen the impact of oil spills on our coastal ecosystems as well as on the outdoor entertainment and tourism economy,” Padila said in a statement. We should not risk repeating history by rebuilding or restarting the pipeline.


Field spokesman Bradlion said the company safely transported 90 billion gallons (341 billion liters) to North America last year. “Meda is committed to designing, building and maintaining these lines in a safe and secure manner,” he said.

The project faces a number of obstacles, including a federal lawsuit against property owners who say they do not have the right to use existing facilities for a new pipeline. “Our clients have never signed up for this,” said Barry Capello, a consultant to the Supreme Court.

Sean Heath, associate professor of martial arts school in Southern California, said the company’s initiative is clear to renovate the pipeline.

“You make money on it,” Hiatt said. “Oil prices will not go down.”

He said the price of a barrel of oil could rise by $ 100 next year. It is now about $ 77.

According to documents submitted by Plains in Santa Barbara County, the replaced pipeline, although smaller than the previous one, could move up to 1.7 million gallons (6.3 million liters) per day. At current prices, that amount could be over $ 3 million a day, or over $ 1 billion a year, even though pipelines often do not run at full capacity.

Oil has been mined in California since the 19th century, but the project is being debated as the state counts its history of fossil fuels. Climate change raises concerns about fires, droughts, and hurricanes, and the state has become a global leader in tackling global warming through renewable energy and pioneering policies.

California – itself the world’s fifth largest economy – plans to block the sale of new gas-powered cars and trucks by 2035 and halt oil production in ten years. The recent rains in Huntington Beach have renewed calls for a halt to all coastal excavations.

Pelins’ pipeline is likely to be a sign of that conflict. The Biden administration – which recently auctioned off vast oil and gas reserves in the Gulf of Mexico – is facing a similar dilemma.

California’s oil and gas industry directly and indirectly supports more than 365,000 jobs and has an annual output of more than $ 150 billion, according to a 2017 study. Nationally, the industry will support nearly 17 million jobs by 2020, according to a trade group report from the Texas Free Manufacturers and Royalty Owners Association. Although it is far from the nation’s largest producer Texas, with nearly 350,000 jobs, California ranks second with 75,000 jobs by direct employment.

Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has spoken of the economic crisis as he retires from the industry while encouraging hope for the state’s green future. The office declined to comment, citing the field project being reviewed by government agencies.

Environmentalists are arguing over the risk of flooding – as well as the risk of earthquakes.

California is known as the birthplace of modern ecological activity, and the 1969 catastrophic flood occurred on the shores of Santa Barbara. Despite that history and the shift to green energy, Newlym’s administration is opposed to taking a firm stand on new fossil fuel projects, said Julie Tel Simmons, senior attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity at the Center for Pipeline pipeline.

She said the state’s decision on the project was an opportunity to continue talking to California by breastfeeding.

Plains Pipeline last used in On May 19, 2015, a landslide erupted west of and above Santa Barbara, sending 140,000 gallons (529,957 liters) of oil to the coast and into the ocean.

Federal regulators, who plan to operate more than 1,609 miles[1609km]from the Texas control room, reopened the bleeding line, unaware that a leak had occurred.

Meda apologized for the spill and paid for the cleaning. Meda was later fined more than $ 3 million. The cleanup cost $ 100 million, and the 2017 report estimated $ 335 million, not including lost revenue.

A key step in the proposed pipeline review – a complex environmental survey conducted in Santa Barbara County – is expected in the spring. The federal, state, and local agencies have a stake in the 2017 project.

It will usually be a snake on the current road. The new line – technically two pipelines, as before – will cross the environmentally vulnerable areas, including the Carizo Meda National Monument and the Los Padres National Forest.

Three online-based Exxon mobile platforms have been shut down. Exxon Mobil proposed the construction of temporary freight lanes for oil transport, which would allow the sleeping ocean platforms to continue producing. In a vote in early November, the Santa Barbara County Planning Commission urged county regulators to reject the company’s proposal.

“Truck transport is the only option,” Exxon Mobile spokesman Julie L. King said in a statement.

Local groups warn that decades of forums pose a different risk than aging tools; Exxon Mobile said the platforms were “safe and secure” while the platforms were closed.

In addition, the line and the replacement line will pass through several earthquake-prone areas. According to a study conducted by Plane, the pipeline will cut 10 potential dams and dozens of active San Andreas fault zones.

According to the study, “parts of the pipeline could be vulnerable to major earthquakes, and some areas may be subject to severe earthquakes.”

Santa Barbara County Supervisors Board Chairman Bob Nelson said he would look into detailed environmental reports next year before making a decision, but was encouraged by what he saw so far. Plains may have wanted to repair the existing pipeline, but instead suggested a new line built with modern safety standards.

“What do jobs mean?” Nelson said. With the continued demand for oil, even when the state was extracting fossil fuels, he said, “I think we need to find a way to supply them in a safe and environmentally friendly way.

Leave a Comment